GM in Talks to Buy Chinese Batteries Made in US by Japan’s TDK

September

12

0 comments

  

​ [[{“value”:”
Deal to license CATL technology similar to Ford, Tesla accords
Pact comes as US policymakers scrutinize China ties on EVs

General Motors Co. is in discussions to buy electric vehicle batteries that would use technology from China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. and be assembled at a new plant slated to be built in the US, according to people familiar with the matter.

The factory would be funded and operated by TDK Corp., a Japanese company that makes components for consumer electronics, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing information that’s private. The plant is expected to be located in the US South and may create more than 1,000 jobs, the people said.

Talks are ongoing and the deal could fall apart or change depending on the outcome of the US presidential election in November, the people added.

The discussions underscore how US automakers are contending with faltering EV demand and a push by Washington policymakers to build a domestic plug-in supply chain to reduce the industry’s reliance on China.

Under the terms of the deal, TDK would license technology from CATL — the world’s biggest maker of EV batteries — to make lithium iron phosphate cells, the people said, similar to existing CATL partnerships with Ford Motor Co. and Tesla Inc. GM doesn’t plan to take an equity stake in the venture, one person said.

Such a technology licensing arrangement may help avoid scrutiny by US lawmakers and the Biden administration, who are wary of collaboration with China on key strategic technologies including EV batteries. Last month, for example, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and Michigan Representative John Moolenaar, both Republicans, asked the Pentagon to put CATL on a restricted list of firms allegedly working with China’s military.

“Our EV strategy is focused on designing products that continue to lower cost, improve performance and localize production. Battery technology is a key enabler of that strategy,” GM said in a statement. The company declined to comment on “speculation.”

Representatives for TDK and CATL declined to comment.

Under the terms of the supply contract, GM and other automakers could buy LFP cells from the TDK plant at a fixed price over the life of a long-term contract, the people said.

That structure would shield carmakers from the wild swings in battery prices they’ve faced in recent years. It would also spare them from investing billions of dollars up-front at a time when EV demand is slowing and the pace of adoption in the US looks more uncertain.

The approach could also serve as a hedge against political uncertainty. Former President Donald Trump has pledged to rescind unspent funding for the Inflation Reduction Act — President Joe Biden’s signature climate law — should he win reelection. That could cripple demand for electric and hybrid vehicles just as automakers are gearing up to sell more of them.

Because carmakers would buy the batteries instead of build them, TDK would bear the cost of any financial penalties if the cells use components that don’t comply with the IRA, which seeks to carve China out of the US EV supply chain, the people said.

The approach represents a more cost efficient path for incumbent automakers, which have been hemorrhaging money trying to build batteries and EVs at scale. At the same time, it would present a fresh challenge for the United Auto Workers union, which conducted a rancorous six-week strike last fall to guarantee jobs for its members at future joint-venture battery plants.

For TDK, the move would expand its reach into electric vehicle batteries, beyond its core consumer electronics business.

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

The post GM in Talks to Buy Chinese Batteries Made in US by Japan’s TDK appeared first on Energy News Beat.

“}]] 

About the author,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}