[[{“value”:”
- All of the majors reported lower earnings for the first quarter.
- Already, some energy companies active in the shale patch are cutting their drilling budgets for the year.
- Oilfield services providers are bracing for impact as several large E&P firms are cutting back on drilling programs.
U.S. oilfield service majors had a good run after the pandemic lockdowns ended. Demand for oil rebounded strongly, drillers drilled more, and even the climate-focused energy policies of the Biden administration could not ruin that. Now, a price rout that has already prompted the E&P segment to issue warning after warning is putting the good run on an extended pause.
All of the majors reported lower earnings for the first quarter—yet more evidence that the lower prices have started to cause some real financial pain in the oilfield services sector. As producers begin to revise their production growth plans for the year—which most of them did at the release of their first-quarter results—the effects of that revision will bite oilfield service providers.
Baker Hughes posted a 27% drop in net profits for the first quarter, to $509 million, and warned about “broader macro and trade policy uncertainty,” meaning tariffs and the oft-cited risk of a global slowdown as a result of these tariffs. But now OPEC+ is also pumping more—much more than it said it would—and this additional supply is making things even worse for producers.
Schlumberger also had a word of warning at the release of its first-quarter figures, which featured a more modest net earnings decline of 4% from a year ago but a 22% decline from a quarter earlier. Schlumberger’s CEO said, “The industry may experience a potential shift of priorities driven by changes in the global economy, fluctuating commodity prices and evolving tariffs — all of which could impact upstream oil and gas investment and, in turn, affect demand for our products and services.”
Halliburton sounded the same alarm when it reported first-quarter performance, especially worried about the possibility that tariffs would lead to a surge in the price of oilfield services equipment—something that producers also worried about earlier this year when President Trump launched his trade policy offensive. Yet it seems the primary concern of the oilfield services sector is the price of crude.
“With oil prices falling out of the well-defined range that had persisted for much of the past 2+ years, producer budgets are encountering meaningful strain for the first time in several years,” analysts from Raymond James said, as quoted by Reuters recently.
Indeed, while there is a debate about the severity of price decline that U.S. shale drillers could endure without shrinking activity, Dallas Fed survey data and Baker Hughes’ weekly rig count reports suggest that West Texas Intermediate below $65 begins to affect activity and the lower it goes, the more severe the impact on drillers, and, by extension, oilfield service providers.
Already some energy companies active in the shale patch are cutting their drilling budgets for the year. Diamondback Energy and Coterra Energy are among them, while the CEO of Formentera Partners, Bryan Sheffield, told Bloomberg last month that “The industry needs to cut immediately and hunker down to let the tariff war play out,” describing the current situation in the industry as a “bloodbath”.
The situation looks worse at home for the oilfield services majors because of shale oil’s relatively high production costs, but it appears that global operations will also see some pain from the tariff war while it lasts. Schlumberger expects a decline in global oil investment, and Baker Hughes and Halliburton expect a direct impact on their share prices and earnings from the fallout from the tariff war.
On the flip side, cheap oil stimulates demand for the commodity, which would ultimately lead to higher prices as history tells us—and it would mitigate the impact of the tariffs. “Unless you export the stuff, cheaper oil should bring some tailwinds for the global economy,” ING’s Global Head of Macro, Carsten Brzeski, wrote in a recent note. “It probably won’t be enough to fully offset the tariff-driven inflation surge in the US, but it could help compensate for the adverse effect on eurozone growth and will definitely add to the current disinflationary trend.”
So, it seems Bryan Sheffield was right when he advised the industry to “hunker down” and let the turbulent times play out. This is what drillers have been doing every few years as the cyclical nature of the industry manifests itself in yet another price rout. Indeed, there were warnings that the trough of the cycle was coming even before Trump began tariffing imports left and right. In January, Rystad Energy said the oilfield services sector was slowing down, and the slowdown would intensify this year.
“Market volatility, heightened geopolitical tensions and cost and capacity challenges,” were the issues Rystad Energy identified for the sector back in January, which suggests that even without a tariff war, oilfield services providers would be having a tough 2025. Yet it’s not all doom and gloom—LNG is thriving, and offshore oil and gas is set to grow, too. The industry will weather this period of depression just as it weathered all the others that came before it.
The post Halliburton, Schlumberger Brace for the Next Oil Slump appeared first on Energy News Beat.
“}]]